Guiding consumers since 2009

ConCourt SASSA ruling: What you need to know

By Jessica Anne Wood

Last week the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) released its judgement in the case regarding the South African Social Security Agency and its contract with Cash Paymaster Services who oversees the payment of grants to recipients.

The contract with CPS has been extended, with the suspension of the invalidity of the contract extended for another year. This is to allow SASSA to find another service provider who can facilitate the payment of the social grants, if it still does not have the capability within the next year to pay the grants out itself.

The court judgement

The final judgement in the case stated: “It is declared that the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA) and Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Limited (CPS) are under a constitutional obligation to ensure payment of social grants to grant beneficiaries from 1 April 2017 until an entity other than CPS is able to do so and that a failure to do so will infringe upon grant beneficiaries’ rights of access to social assistance under section 27(1)(c) of the Constitution.

“The declaration of invalidity of the contract is further suspended for the 12-month period from 1 April 2017.”

The ConCourt highlighted that through the process of paying the social grants, CPS should not earn a profit as people have a constitutional right to receive the grants.

The court stated: “No party has any claim to profit from the threatened invasion of people’s rights. At the same time no one should usually be expected to be out of pocket for ensuring the continued exercise of those rights. That equilibrium was the premise of the Court’s previous remedial order. It is just and equitable to continue on that basis. Our order below reflects that SASSA and CPS should continue to fulfil their respective constitutional obligations in the payment of social grants for a period of 12 months as an extension of the current contract. To the extent necessary, our earlier declaration of invalidity of that contract will be further extended, as well as the suspension of that declaration of invalidity. In the event that CPS wishes to alter the content of its financial obligations or entitlement, the order makes provision for it to approach National Treasury for its consideration and approval, to be confirmed after a report on the issue to this Court.”

A report on Business Day highlighted that CPS may be required to return the estimated R1 billion it received since the contract was implemented five years ago.

Following the ConCourt initial suspension of the invalidity of the contract between SASSA and CPS, the court stated: “Within 60 days of the completion of the five-year period for which the contract was initially awarded (31 March 2017), Cash Paymaster must file with this court an audited statement of the expenses incurred, the income received and the net profit earned under the completed contract.

“SASSA must within 60 days thereafter obtain an independent audited verification of the details provided by Cash Paymaster under [the] paragraph [above] and file the audited verification with this Court.”

According to the latest ruling by the ConCourt, the auditing process mentioned above must be carried out after the current 12 month extension on the suspension of the invalidity of the contract.

SASSA’s delayed communication with the ConCourt

The ConCourt noted with concern that SASSA was aware that it would not be able to take over the payment of social grants from 1 April 2017 as early as April 2016.

“Since April 2016 the responsible functionaries of SASSA have been aware that it could not comply with the undertaking to the Court that it would be able to pay social grants from 1 April 2017. The Minister says she was informed of this only in October 2016. There is no indication on the papers that she showed any interest in SASSA’s progress before that. Despite repeated warnings from advising counsel and CPS, neither SASSA nor the Minister took any steps to inform the Court of the problems they were experiencing. Nor did they see fit to approach the Court for authorisation to regularise the situation.”

The court added: “The sole reason for the litigation leading to this judgment is the failure of SASSA and the Minister to keep their promise to this Court and the people of South Africa.”

Recent Articles

Featured What’s the deal with underwriting?

When you apply for a long-term insurance policy, a financial adviser will ask some personal questions about your lifestyle, family history, health, and even ask you to take some medical tests. This process is called underwriting, but is it really necessary?


How are you taxed on your retrenchment package?

Unemployment is one of the biggest problems in South Africa. The emergence of the Covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated the situation with a lot of companies retrenching their employees.  When retrenched, you’ll receive a retrenchment package, but do you know how much tax you’re liable for?

Car repossessed – don’t be taken for a ride

When the country is facing an economic downturn, chances are your finances will feel the pinch. This can lead you to make bad financial decisions such as skipping your vehicle payments. But every decision has consequences and if you don’t pay your instalment, the bank will repossess your car. But what can you do when this happens?


Why you should consider gap cover

Your medical aid should protect you from incurring large medical bills when you’re sick. But what if your plan doesn’t cover the full cost of your medical expenses? We got in touch with insurance experts to find out whether gap cover is worth having.


Office furniture at discounted prices at BDK

Price: Available on request
When: Daily
Where: Johannesburg

Da Vincis Happy Hour Special

Price: Available on request
When: Daily
Where: Cape Town

Use your Absa card and get 30% cashback at Dis-chem

Price: Available on request
When: Daily
Where: Nationwide

Latest Guide

Guide to debt rehabilitation solutions