Guiding consumers since 2009

Finance regulator bill ‘too onerous’

By Staff Writer

By Linda Ensor

The bid by the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) to tighten the regulation of the financial services and other sectors has met with a chorus of objections.

Banks, short- and long-term insurers, the auditing profession, lawyers, estate agents, accountants and casinos have expressed grave concern about aspects of the Financial Intelligence Centre Amendment Bill, which is the subject of public hearings by Parliament’s finance committee.

The aim of the bill is to strengthen the enforcement and regulatory powers of the FIC, which was established to track suspicious transactions, and combat money-laundering and the financing of terrorist activities. But business is critical of the proposals for concentrating power within the FIC.

The proposed administrative penalties for non-compliance, of up to a maximum of R10m for natural persons or R50m for legal persons, in addition to criminal sanctions, were criticised as too onerous.

A clause that raised objections across the board was one giving all directives, orders or determinations issued by the FIC the status of a law without their being subjected to scrutiny by Parliament and without the obligation to consult.

Many submissions said this was unconstitutional.

Casino Association of SA CE Derek Auret said the provisions had “the effect of transforming the FIC and supervisory bodies (into) legislator, judge, jury and executioner”.

In his submission, Banking Association of SA CEO Cas Coovadia said the bill seemed to be creating a “super-regulator” over the existing supervisory bodies. Inevitably, he said, the increased cost of compliance with all the laws and regulations and the multiplicity of registration requirements for accountable institutions would have to be borne by consumers.

Absa group general counsel Johannes Gouws said: “The bill in its current form does not aim to combat crime; it simply augments compliance obligations.”

The Reserve Bank and the registrar of banks were concerned about “the extent to which supervisory bodies may be exposed to liability under the amendment bill”.

Recent Articles

Featured What are the three phases of money laundering?

Money laundering seems like the kind of thing that’s only a concern in blockbuster films. However, South Africa is, in fact, considered a hotspot for money laundering. So, what does this actually entail, and what are the consequences of this illicit practice?

Asset repossession: What banks want you to know

When you’re facing financial strain, it can be difficult to keep up with your debt. Unfortunately, if you refrain from paying your debt, your creditors have the right to take legal action against you. This includes repossessing your assets. But before you hand them over, here’s what you should know.

How to spend a lumpsum for great returns

Imagine you win the lotto. Anyone in this position would be ecstatic! But once your excitement settles down, you’ll have to consider what’s the best thing to do with this money.

How to identify an investment scam

Many people invest a lot of money for their future and that of their offspring. Unfortunately, some of them never reap the benefits because the investments were scams. Luckily, there are ways you can find out if an investment opportunity is too good to be true.

Deals

Get 50% off your friend’s treatment at Mangwanani Spa

Price: from R250
When: Until 30 August
Where: KZN and JHB

Telkom LTE lockdown Deal

Price: R369 per month
When: Until 31 August 2020
Where: Nationwide

Save up to 20% on your car insurance with MiWay

Price: Available on request
When: Daily
Where: Nationwide


Latest Guide

Guide to debt rehabilitation solutions